Fill in Your Da 2166 9 1 Template

What is the purpose of the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The DA 2166 9 1 form is used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant. It serves as an official record of an NCO's performance, professionalism, and potential for future assignments. This evaluation helps in making informed decisions regarding promotions, assignments, and overall career development within the Army.

Who needs to complete the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The form must be completed by the rater, senior rater, and the rated NCO. The rater assesses the NCO's performance and provides feedback. The senior rater reviews the evaluation and offers insights into the NCO's potential. The rated NCO is required to sign the form, acknowledging that they have seen the completed report and understand the evaluation process.

What information is required on the DA 2166 9 1 form?

Key information includes the NCO's name, Social Security Number (or DOD ID), rank, and unit details. The form also requires the period covered by the evaluation, the names and signatures of the rater and senior rater, and performance metrics such as the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) results. Additionally, the rater must provide comments on various attributes, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievements.

How does the evaluation process work?

The evaluation process begins with the rater filling out the form based on their observations of the NCO's performance. After the rater completes their assessment, the senior rater reviews it and adds their own evaluation of the NCO's potential. The rated NCO then reviews the completed form, signs it, and can provide comments or feedback. This entire process ensures a comprehensive evaluation that reflects the NCO's contributions and areas for improvement.

1. Incomplete or Incorrect Personal Information: One common mistake is failing to provide complete and accurate personal details in Part I. This includes the name, Social Security Number (SSN), rank, and unit information. Missing or incorrect data can delay processing and create complications.

2. Failure to Verify Counseling Dates: Many individuals overlook the importance of verifying counseling dates in Part II. Accurate dates are crucial as they confirm that the rated NCO has received the necessary feedback and support. Missing or incorrect dates can lead to misunderstandings about performance evaluations.

3. Neglecting to Include Required Signatures: Some people forget to obtain the necessary signatures from the rater, senior rater, and supplementary reviewer. Each signature is a vital part of the evaluation process, ensuring accountability and transparency. Without these signatures, the form may be deemed incomplete.

4. Inadequate Performance Comments: Providing insufficient or vague comments in the performance evaluation sections can hinder a complete understanding of the rated NCO's capabilities. Specific examples and detailed observations are essential for a fair assessment. Failing to include these can diminish the effectiveness of the evaluation.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a crucial document in the evaluation process for Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Alongside this form, several other documents and forms are commonly utilized to ensure a comprehensive evaluation and record-keeping process. Each of these documents serves a specific purpose, contributing to the overall assessment of an NCO's performance and potential.

• DA Form 4856: This form is used for counseling sessions between NCOs and their superiors. It documents the discussions regarding performance, expectations, and areas for improvement, ensuring that both parties have a clear understanding of the objectives moving forward.
• DA Form 670-1: This form is the Army's official uniform regulation document. It outlines the standards for wearing the Army uniform, which is essential for maintaining professionalism and discipline within the ranks.
• DA Form 705: This form records the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It provides a snapshot of an NCO's physical readiness, which is a critical component of overall performance evaluations.
• DA Form 2-1: The personnel qualification record, or DA Form 2-1, contains an individual's career history, including assignments, training, and qualifications. This document is vital for evaluating an NCO's experience and readiness for future roles.
• DA Form 201: This form serves as the Army's official record of a soldier's career. It includes important details such as duty assignments, training, and other significant events that have shaped the soldier's service.
• DA Form 2627: This form is utilized for non-judicial punishment proceedings under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). It documents any disciplinary actions taken against an NCO, which can impact their evaluation and future opportunities.
• DA Form 1059: This form is used to document the completion of military education courses. It provides evidence of an NCO's professional development and commitment to self-improvement, which are key factors in performance evaluations.
• Army Regulation 623-3: This regulation outlines the policies and procedures for the Army's evaluation process. It serves as a guiding document for both evaluators and NCOs, ensuring that evaluations are conducted fairly and consistently.

These documents collectively enhance the evaluation process for NCOs, providing a well-rounded view of an individual's capabilities, performance, and potential for future leadership roles. Proper use of these forms ensures that evaluations are thorough, transparent, and conducive to the professional growth of soldiers in the Army.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is similar to the DA Form 67-9, which is the Company Grade Plate Evaluation Report. Both forms serve as evaluation tools for military personnel, focusing on performance and potential. The DA Form 67-9 is used for officers in the company grade, while the 2166-9-1 specifically targets non-commissioned officers (NCOs). Each form requires details about the individual’s duties, achievements, and areas of improvement, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of their capabilities and contributions to the Army.

Another comparable document is the DA Form 1059, the Service School Academic Evaluation Report. This form evaluates the academic performance of military personnel who attend training courses. Like the 2166-9-1, it emphasizes the importance of assessment in professional development. Both documents require signatures from raters and senior raters, highlighting the collaborative nature of evaluations within the military structure.

The DA Form 4856, also known as the Developmental Counseling Form, shares similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1 in that both are used to document and communicate performance. The 4856 is typically used for counseling sessions to address specific performance issues or goals, while the 2166-9-1 provides a broader overview of an NCO’s performance over time. Both forms facilitate feedback and encourage professional growth within the ranks.

Additionally, the DA Form 7000, the Financial Liability Investigation of Property Loss, can be seen as similar in its evaluative nature, though it focuses on financial accountability rather than performance. Both forms require detailed reporting and signatures, ensuring that all involved parties acknowledge the findings. They both emphasize the importance of documentation in maintaining standards within the military.

The DA Form 7570, which is the Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard, also relates to the DA Form 2166-9-1 by assessing physical performance. The 2166-9-1 includes a section on physical fitness, making it essential for evaluating an NCO's overall readiness. Both forms highlight the significance of physical conditioning in military service and require accurate reporting of results.

The DA Form 2166-9-2, the NCO Evaluation Report for SFC and above, is another document that aligns with the 2166-9-1. While the latter is for SGTs, the 2166-9-2 covers higher-ranking NCOs. Both forms assess leadership abilities, performance, and potential, ensuring that evaluations are consistent across different ranks within the NCO structure.

Similarly, the DA Form 2823, the Sworn Statement, can be compared to the DA Form 2166-9-1 in terms of documentation. While the 2823 is used to gather factual accounts for investigations, both forms require careful attention to detail and accuracy. They play crucial roles in maintaining accountability and transparency within military operations.

Lastly, the DA Form 4856-1, the NCOER Counseling Checklist, complements the 2166-9-1 by providing a structured approach to performance counseling. Both documents aim to enhance communication between NCOs and their leaders. They help establish clear expectations and track progress, contributing to the overall development of military personnel.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, there are important guidelines to follow. Here’s a list of things you should and shouldn't do:

• Do ensure all names are written clearly and in the correct order.
• Do double-check the Social Security Number or DOD ID Number for accuracy.
• Do fill in all required fields completely before submission.
• Do use the correct email format (.gov or .mil) for all email addresses.
• Do verify the dates are in the correct format (YYYYMMDD).
• Don't leave any sections blank unless specified as optional.
• Don't forget to include the required enclosures if applicable.
• Don't use abbreviations that may not be understood by all reviewers.
• Don't rush through the form; take your time to ensure everything is accurate.

Following these guidelines will help ensure your form is completed correctly and efficiently.

Understanding the DA 2166-9-1 form is crucial for service members, but several misconceptions can lead to confusion. Here are five common misunderstandings about this evaluation report form:

• Misconception 1: The form is only for negative evaluations.

Many believe that the DA 2166-9-1 is used solely to document poor performance. In reality, it is designed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of an NCO's performance, highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement.

• Misconception 2: The signature of the rated NCO indicates agreement with the evaluation.

Some think that signing the form means the rated NCO agrees with everything written in the evaluation. However, the signature merely verifies that the administrative data is correct and that the NCO has seen the completed report.

• Misconception 3: The evaluation is only relevant at the time of submission.

There is a belief that once the form is submitted, it is no longer relevant. In truth, the evaluations can impact future assignments, promotions, and career progression, making them important long after submission.

• Misconception 4: Only the rater influences the final evaluation.

Some individuals assume that only the rater's input matters. However, the senior rater also plays a significant role in assessing the NCO's potential and overall performance, adding another layer of evaluation.

• Misconception 5: The form does not require any specific format or detail.

Many think that the form can be filled out in any manner. In fact, specific guidelines dictate how to complete the form, ensuring that evaluations are consistent and thorough. Adhering to these guidelines is essential for clarity and accuracy.

Filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form requires attention to detail and adherence to specific guidelines. Here are key takeaways regarding this process:

• Administrative Data: Ensure all personal information, including name, rank, and unit, is accurately filled out in Part I.
• Submission Reason: Clearly indicate the reason for submission in the designated section to avoid confusion.
• Rater and Senior Rater Information: Complete the rater and senior rater sections with accurate names, signatures, and email addresses.
• Duty Description: Provide a comprehensive description of daily duties and responsibilities in Part III to reflect the rated NCO's role.
• Performance Evaluation: In Part IV, evaluate the rated NCO on various attributes, ensuring comments are constructive and relevant.
• Counseling Dates: Document all counseling dates accurately, as these are crucial for record-keeping and performance tracking.
• Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO's signature does not imply agreement but confirms the accuracy of the report's administrative data.
• Review Process: Understand the appeals process as outlined in AR 623-3, which allows for addressing any concerns regarding the evaluation.